Appeals and Timeline
From appeal finality rules and SCCRC thresholds to parole procedures and a narrow scope for judicial review, the decisive barriers have been procedural. None of the later milestones added new incriminating evidence against Luke; instead, they upheld or deferred to earlier processes. Crucial DNA evidence remains untested, and new findings that could exonerate Luke have been ignored.
Present Position (2025)
Luke Mitchell (now 37) remains in custody at HMP Shotts, continuing to maintain his innocence.
No new incriminating evidence has been introduced in the legal milestones above. Instead, the decisive factors have been:
Appeal finality (closing the door to Cadder on the merits).
SCCRC’s no-referral conclusion despite an acknowledged rights breach and untested DNA evidence.
Destruction of productions, limiting prospects for modern re-testing. Thankfully, forensic samples still remain.
Parole practices that disadvantage prisoners who maintain innocence.
Judicial review confined to the lawfulness of process, not re-weighing trial evidence.
Two decades on, Luke’s continued imprisonment reflects a sequence of procedural outcomes that preserve the status quo. The system has repeatedly chosen not to reopen the case; it has not been driven by new or stronger proof of guilt.
Timeline of Major Legal Milestones in Luke Mitchell’s Case
2004 – Arrest and Charges
14 April 2004: Luke Mitchell (aged 15) is arrested and charged with the murder of 14-year-old Jodi Jones, following a 10-month investigation. Jodi had been found brutally killed on 30 June 2003 in woodland near Dalkeith, Midlothian.
18 November 2004: Mitchell’s trial begins at the High Court of Justiciary in Edinburgh. He pleads not guilty to murder and to associated charges, including possession of knives and supplying cannabis. Mitchell lodges a special defence of alibi and incrimination, stating he was at home cooking dinner at the time. The trial becomes the longest single-accused case in modern Scottish legal history, running for 42 days.
2005 – Trial, Conviction, and Sentencing
21 January 2005: After six weeks of proceedings, a jury convicts Mitchell of Jodi’s murder by a majority verdict. He is also convicted of supplying cannabis.
11 February 2005: Lord Nimmo Smith sentences Mitchell to life imprisonment with a minimum punishment part of 20 years. At just 16 years old, he is told he will be in his mid-30s before he can be considered for parole.
2006–2011 – Appeals in the High Court
March 2006: Mitchell is granted leave to appeal against conviction and sentence.
6 May 2008: The Court of Criminal Appeal rejects all six grounds of appeal. Judges criticise as “outrageous” the police’s decision to interview Mitchell (then 14) without a lawyer, and describes the interviewing officers’ conduct as abhorrent, but conclude it does not render the conviction unsafe.
2 February 2011: A second appeal challenges the 20-year tariff. Lord Gill, the Lord Justice Clerk, dissents, describing the sentence as excessive for someone who was only 14 at the time. The majority overrules his view, and the sentence remains.
15 April 2011: A “Cadder appeal” argues that Mitchell’s 2003 interview without legal representation breached human rights under the landmark Cadder v HM Advocate ruling. The appeal is rejected on procedural grounds — the case was already closed, and the ruling would not be applied retrospectively.
23 November 2011: Mitchell is refused permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court. With this, his formal avenues of appeal within the UK judicial system are exhausted.
2012–2014 – SCCRC Case Review
20 July 2012: Mitchell’s legal team submits a 300-page dossier to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC), citing new evidence and failures in the original investigation.
July 2014: The SCCRC confirms that interviewing Mitchell without a solicitor breached his rights under Article 6 of the ECHR. However, it ruled that this did not amount to a miscarriage of justice. commissions new DNA testing on previously unexamined samples from Jodi’s clothing. The results revealed semen from an unidentified male, not Mitchell.
Despite these findings, the SCCRC concludes that the conviction still does not amount to a miscarriage of justice and declines to refer the case back to the Court of Appeal. Even with fresh DNA evidence excluding Luke, the system closed ranks. The Commission acknowledged rights violations and the presence of an unknown male’s DNA, but still ruled the conviction safe — emphasising process and “finality” rather than revisiting the case in court.
2021–2022 – Renewed Scrutiny and the Destruction of Evidence
February 2021: Channel 5 broadcasts Murder in a Small Town, a two-part documentary re-examining the case. It reignites public debate and highlights untested evidence and alternative suspects.
May 2021: Less than two months after the documentary aired, internal discussions began between Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) about destroying the physical productions (case evidence). COPFS grants permission — not through the standard process — for destruction of the items listed on the indictment. In practice, Police Scotland begins to destroy far more than that, including other retained evidence that could have been relevant for future review.
At the same time, Luke is transferred to HMP Greenock to prepare for possible parole. While evidence is being destroyed, Police Scotland launches an in-depth “case review” into Luke’s past, seeking any other alleged offending behaviour. This move effectively halts his parole progression, placing institutional obstacles in front of him despite the lack of new incriminating material.
November 2022: Campaigners deliver a petition with over 25,000 signatures to the Scottish Government, demanding an independent inquiry into the handling of the case and the destruction of evidence.
2024–2025 – Parole and Judicial Review
April 2024: Having served his 20-year minimum term, Mitchell becomes eligible for parole. The Parole Board for Scotland denies release, citing an inability to assess risk. A Serious Offender Liaison Service (SOLS) report labels him a “sexual risk to women” — a conclusion disputed by campaigners and made more complex by his continued insistence on innocence.
Late 2024: Mitchell’s legal team files a petition for judicial review at the Court of Session, arguing that the Parole Board acted unfairly by withholding the SOLS report.
6 February 2025: A hearing before Lady Haldane considers these claims.
20 February 2025: Judgment is issued: the petition is refused. The Parole Board’s decision to deny parole is upheld, not because of new evidence of guilt, but because the court finds no procedural illegality in how the Board reached its decision.
Present Day (2025)
Luke Mitchell remains imprisoned at HMP Shotts. He is now 37 years old and continues to maintain his innocence. Despite multiple appeals, reviews, and campaigns, every legal avenue has so far upheld the original conviction.
What is striking is not the discovery of new compelling evidence against him, but the systemic barriers that prevent his case from being revisited:
Courts are refusing to apply new human rights rulings retrospectively.
A review body (SCCRC) acknowledged breaches of rights and unknown semen samples recovered from Jodi Jones’ clothing, but still, they did not refer the case back to the appeal court.
The destruction of potential evidence that could have been tested with modern forensic techniques.
A parole system that punishes those who maintain innocence by refusing to engage in guilt-based rehabilitation.
In short, Luke Mitchell’s continued imprisonment is not driven by fresh proof of guilt, but by the legal system’s reluctance to re-examine a case that has long been questioned.
Stand With Luke — Demand Justice
For over two decades, Luke Mitchell has remained behind bars on the basis of a conviction riddled with unanswered questions, lost opportunities, and a system that has prioritised procedure over truth. Rights were breached, new DNA evidence pointed away from him, and vital productions were destroyed — yet his case has never been properly revisited in court.
The reality is stark: Luke is not held back by new proof of guilt, but by a justice system that refuses to reopen his case. Appeals have been blocked by technicalities, evidence has been lost, and parole has been denied because he will not confess to a crime he insists he did not commit. Without your help, his fight for justice cannot move forward.
Support the fight for justice today
Donate to the CrowdJustice campaign →
